Back to the main page.
Bug 683 - ft_movieplot for Time-frequency analysis
| Status | ASSIGNED |
| Reported | 2011-05-24 13:01:00 +0200 |
| Modified | 2014-02-11 16:37:23 +0100 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | plotting |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | Macintosh |
| Operating System: | Mac OS |
| Importance: | P1 enhancement |
| Assigned to: | Jörn M. Horschig |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Gustavo Rohenkohl - 2011-05-24 13:01:34 +0200
Hi, this is not a bug, but a suggestion. It would be very interesting to have an option of movie plot for time-frequency analysis (i.e. ft_movieplotTFR). Cheers, Gustavo
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-10-17 22:24:36 +0200
Hi Jorn I noticed this old suggestion in bugzilla. Can you please post Gustavo when you are done implementing the stuff for bug 1036? thanks, Robert
Jörn M. Horschig - 2011-10-18 13:58:09 +0200
sure, I'll will. Still takes some time though, cause I want to deal with some older bugs first.
Jörn M. Horschig - 2012-04-27 14:54:03 +0200
In principle, the moviefunction I made can already make movies. It still lacks the possibility of storing the movie. How should storing be done? Should the function return a big matrix, or should the movie be automatically stored as a .avi? I still need to work on restructuring the funciton, i.e. atm source- and sensormovies are all in one function. Should I first upload the moviefunction and make the other functions a wrapper around the new function, or first restructure? Additionally, there are some more options I would like to add to make it a real-kickass function (custom colormap, perspective switch button for 3D data, online limitation of time axis, ...) With regard to the big conference coming up, would it be a good idea to advertise the updated moviefunctions to the list when it's finished? Would be great to see some moving TFRs/beamformed results at HBM, BioMag, SfN or other conferences, right? @Gustavo: If you want a sneak peak of the new function, let me know! I can send you the (yet unpolished) function. It would actually be great if someone would already work with it to get feedback on other functionality that could be added, or simply on bugs. @Robert: Next Wednesday I'll also show you guys the current status
- 2014-02-11 16:15:52 +0100
@ Jörn: I'm working with my TFRs at the source-level, and would also love to have such a function ^_^. I wouldn't mind contributing to this/helping out and am eager to learn, if you think I'd be useful on this?