Back to the main page.
Bug 1001 - ft_plot_headshape redundant?
Status | CLOSED FIXED |
Reported | 2011-10-03 18:58:00 +0200 |
Modified | 2019-08-10 12:33:24 +0200 |
Product: | FieldTrip |
Component: | core |
Version: | unspecified |
Hardware: | PC |
Operating System: | Windows |
Importance: | P1 normal |
Assigned to: | Stephen Whitmarsh |
URL: | |
Tags: | |
Depends on: | |
Blocks: | |
See also: |
Stephen Whitmarsh - 2011-10-03 18:58:36 +0200
Stephen Whitmarsh - 2011-10-03 19:01:11 +0200
ambiguous with other plotting functions, i.e. plot_mesh
Stephen Whitmarsh - 2011-10-03 19:04:05 +0200
In any case it does not plot meshes correctly (only points, no mesh) derived from prepare_headmodel. So make it or break it?
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-10-05 09:09:18 +0200
Just to ensure that the following is clear: ft_plot_headshape has to do with ft_read_headshape, not with the private/headsurface or private/head_surf functions. The ft_read_headshape function has been getting more responsibilities over time, initially it just returned a set of points, then also the fiducials (in some cases) where the fiducials can be in MRI coords as opposed to head coords (hence the warp_apply). Then we also started using it for cortical sheets (for Lilla's MNE/FreeSurfer pipeline) It is indeed not clear whether the "headshape" should be considered a principal building block. Is the function being called from somewhere? @Vladimir: are you using the ft_plot_xxx functions in SPM?
Vladimir Litvak - 2011-10-05 09:12:58 +0200
Not directly. Just via other FT functions (headmodelplot)
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2013-10-10 10:38:36 +0200
Reviving some old bugs. @Stephen: please think about whether this one is still 'actueel'/relevant, and assign it to yourself in order to fix it at some point. If not relevant anymore, please close.
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2016-02-21 14:27:45 +0100
Does not seem to be relevant anymore (as per my previous comment), since Stephen has not followed up on this one for a few years. Changing status for this reason.