Back to the main page.
Bug 1089 - documentation of layouts for plotting should be made consistent
| Status | ASSIGNED |
| Reported | 2011-10-28 16:38:00 +0200 |
| Modified | 2011-11-23 14:33:11 +0100 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | documentation |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | All |
| Operating System: | All |
| Importance: | P4 normal |
| Assigned to: | Eelke Spaak |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-10-28 16:38:59 +0200
I noticed the following in topoplotER % The layout defines how the channels are arranged. You can specify the % layout in a variety of ways: % - you can provide a pre-computed layout structure, see FT_PREPARE_LAYOUT % - you can give the name of an ascii layout file with extension *.lay % - you can give the name of an electrode file % - you can give an electrode definition, i.e. "elec" structure % - you can give a gradiometer definition, i.e. "grad" structure % If you do not specify any of these and the data structure contains an % electrode or gradiometer structure, that will be used for creating a % layout. If you want to have more fine-grained control over the layout % of the subplots, you should create your own layout file. I suggest to make a shorter description in the p[lotting functions and have the user refer to ft_prepare_layout for full details. Consequently, all of this info has to be merged with the help of ft_prepare_layout