Back to the main page.

Bug 1313 - chantype/chanunit -> should we consider to represent them at the level of the grad, rather than in the header?

Reported 2012-02-06 09:47:00 +0100
Modified 2012-02-06 15:50:24 +0100
Product: FieldTrip
Component: core
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Operating System: Mac OS
Importance: P3 normal
Assigned to: Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Depends on:
See also:

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-02-06 09:47:06 +0100

The header may be lost along the way, which makes it difficult to recover the unit/type info.

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-02-06 09:49:47 +0100

Sorry. It is actually already the case ;-)

Robert Oostenveld - 2012-02-06 10:05:16 +0100

for reference to others: note that chantype also extends to trigger channels and ExG channels, which are not represented in the (forward) model for the MEG channels (i.e. in the grad).