Back to the main page.

Bug 1313 - chantype/chanunit -> should we consider to represent them at the level of the grad, rather than in the header?

Status	CLOSED INVALID
Reported	2012-02-06 09:47:00 +0100
Modified	2012-02-06 15:50:24 +0100
Product:	FieldTrip
Component:	core
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	PC
Operating System:	Mac OS
Importance:	P3 normal
Assigned to:	Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
URL:
Tags:
Depends on:
Blocks:
See also:

---

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-02-06 09:47:06 +0100

The header may be lost along the way, which makes it difficult to recover the unit/type info.

---

Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-02-06 09:49:47 +0100

Sorry. It is actually already the case ;-)

---

Robert Oostenveld - 2012-02-06 10:05:16 +0100

for reference to others: note that chantype also extends to trigger channels and ExG channels, which are not represented in the (forward) model for the MEG channels (i.e. in the grad).