Back to the main page.
Bug 1607 - realigning channel order changes ft_topoplots
Status | CLOSED INVALID |
Reported | 2012-07-09 19:14:00 +0200 |
Modified | 2015-07-15 13:21:17 +0200 |
Product: | FieldTrip |
Component: | plotting |
Version: | unspecified |
Hardware: | PC |
Operating System: | Linux |
Importance: | P3 normal |
Assigned to: | Jim Herring |
URL: | |
Tags: | |
Depends on: | |
Blocks: | |
See also: |
jonas van nijnatten - 2012-07-09 19:14:33 +0200
During preprocessing I lost some channels which I got back through ft_channelrepair after which the channel order changed per subject. I realigned the channel order and the associated data structure of each subject to one reference order after which the topoplots look completely different. They look even worse than before realignment. Anybody got a clue where the confusion arises? Attached a script and two data files, one with reference data and one with the to be aligned data.
jonas van nijnatten - 2012-07-09 19:22:53 +0200
Created attachment 292 data with chan reference and to be aligned data
Jörn M. Horschig - 2012-07-10 13:17:36 +0200
I'm gonna have a look and see whether it's a quick fix
Jörn M. Horschig - 2012-07-10 13:33:58 +0200
try doing: nERPdata_nD_left{isubject}.avg(loc,:) = ERPdata_nD_left{isubject}.avg(:,:); % realign data to ref channel order instead then it works fine
Jörn M. Horschig - 2012-08-23 14:02:03 +0200
bug closing time (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGytDsqkQY8)
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-09-26 13:59:42 +0200
Stephen thinks that it still does not work. He is going to provide a snippet of code and some data so that we can reproduce and fix.
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2012-10-31 13:49:47 +0100
*** Bug 1800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Diego Lozano Soldevilla - 2013-02-13 13:34:15 +0100
is this still relevant? if not, close please
Jim Herring - 2013-02-27 10:50:59 +0100
Changing channel order by shuffling channels does not result in different topo/multiplots. This bug was possibly related to bug 1986.