Back to the main page.
Bug 1906 - consider implementing ft_evalfun
| Status | CLOSED FIXED |
| Reported | 2012-12-19 14:02:00 +0100 |
| Modified | 2013-04-23 12:06:29 +0200 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | core |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | PC |
| Operating System: | Windows |
| Importance: | P3 normal |
| Assigned to: | Robert Oostenveld |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Robert Oostenveld - 2012-12-19 14:02:03 +0100
this would allow people to run their own code, still keeping provenance (thanks to Jim)
Robert Oostenveld - 2013-01-23 15:00:56 +0100
I think that ft_annotate makes sense, as in cfg.comment = 'something' data = ft_annotate(cfg, data) but that a replacement feval in ft style does not make enough sense.
Robert Oostenveld - 2013-01-23 16:00:51 +0100
raspberry> svn commit ft_annotate.m Adding ft_annotate.m Transmitting file data . Committed revision 7395. PS if anyone feels like it, please have a look at the reference documentation in the function and improve it if you can.
Robert Oostenveld - 2013-04-23 12:05:54 +0200
closed various bugs