Back to the main page.
Bug 2279 - default conductivity values at different inputs of concentricspheres are inconsistent?
| Status | CLOSED FIXED |
| Reported | 2013-09-09 17:35:00 +0200 |
| Modified | 2013-09-10 16:18:37 +0200 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | documentation |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | PC |
| Operating System: | Windows |
| Importance: | P3 normal |
| Assigned to: | Lilla Magyari |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Lilla Magyari - 2013-09-09 17:35:52 +0200
Hi, I run the concentricspheres method of prepare_headmodel with 3 different type of inputs, and I am wondering whether conductivity with value 1 is realistic. 1 compartment mesh output conductivity value: 1 3 compartments mesh output conductivity values: [0.3300 0.0042 0.3300] 4 compartments mesh output conductivity values: [0.3300 1 0.0042 0.3300] Should we change the default values to more realistic ones also at 1 or 4 compartments? And actually, the default conductivities are not documented at all. Lilla
Lilla Magyari - 2013-09-09 17:52:06 +0200
(In reply to comment #0) of course, the 1 layered one does not make too much sense. Or does it?
Robert Oostenveld - 2013-09-10 11:10:21 +0200
(In reply to comment #1) the one-layered one is indeed not meant to represent any true physiological model. It is there just for testing purposes.
Lilla Magyari - 2013-09-10 15:00:03 +0200
I guess the conductivity 1 in the 4 layer mdoel is supposed to be the conductivity of the CSF. When I asked Johannes what kind conductivity they use for CSF in FEM, he wrote: 1.79. Should I change it? Should I put the default conductivity values into the documentation of ft_headmodel_concentricspheres? (In reply to comment #2)
Lilla Magyari - 2013-09-10 16:09:25 +0200
(In reply to comment #3) I guess it is not good to change it because of backwards-compatibilty issues.