Back to the main page.
Bug 401 - update publications list on wiki
| Status | CLOSED FIXED |
| Reported | 2011-01-14 12:24:00 +0100 |
| Modified | 2011-07-05 15:12:19 +0200 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | documentation |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | PC |
| Operating System: | Mac OS |
| Importance: | P1 normal |
| Assigned to: | Eelke Spaak |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-01-14 12:24:39 +0100
see http://fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl/publications it should be sorted like 2011 - paper 1 - paper 2 - paper 3 2010 - paper 1 - paper 2 ... 2005 - paper 1 furthermore, using pubmed, wos and google scholar the list should be completed (but only when they really refer to fieldtrip)
Eelke Spaak - 2011-05-17 13:30:13 +0200
I am working on adding a BibTeX-plugin to our DokuWiki installation, so that we can easily add BibTeX-formatted references and they will all be nicely formatted to the exact same style.
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-05-17 13:55:35 +0200
(In reply to comment #1) > I am working on adding a BibTeX-plugin to our DokuWiki installation, so that we > can easily add BibTeX-formatted references and they will all be nicely > formatted to the exact same style. With future updating in mind: could we easily get the references properly updated/extended for http://scholar.google.nl/scholar?hl=nl&q=%22fieldtrip.fcdonders.nl%22&btnG=Zoeken&lr=&as_sdt=0%2C5 http://scholar.google.nl/scholar?hl=nl&q=%22ru.nl%2Fneuroimaging%2Ffieldtrip%22&btnG=Zoeken&lr=&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 and from pubmed, web of science and the like? With plain text that is relatively easy and not critically dependent on formatting, whereas bibtex is more strict on the format and less easy to copy-paste. I am a bit afraid that bibtex might be an overkill. Keep in mind that external people should also be able to add their references. But you can try to convince me otherwise ;-)
Eelke Spaak - 2011-05-17 14:01:10 +0200
Google Scholar was actually the main reason I thought of adding a BibTeX-thing to our wiki; you can have it automatically output bibtex entries (go to 'Voorkeuren voor Scholar' --> 'Bibliografieprogramma', or whatever the English equivalent is). This will make the copy/pasting into our wiki very easy. I'm not sure, but I think pubmed should have something similar. Having pre-formatted plaintext is nice, but with a lot of references and multiple people adding them, the format will probably get quite messy. Currently on the production wiki, there are e.g. first and last names switched around and that sort of thing. Convinced? ;)
Eelke Spaak - 2011-05-17 21:24:43 +0200
My dokuwiki BibTeX plugin is now finished, and it works! See http://fieldtrip_test.fcdonders.nl/doku.php?id=publications for an example. Entries are automatically sorted by year (descending) first, then by author (ascending). I also wrote a Google Scholar bibtex scraper, but as you can see on that page there is quite some crappy stuff in Google Scholar's database. Let's discuss whether we really want to start with this automatic scraping. Also, the page now only contains the first 100 hits (out of 107) for "fieldtrip fcdonders nl" OR "www.ru.nl/donders/fieldtrip" OR "www.ru.nl/neuroimaging/fieldtrip". Google then decided: " We're sorry... ... but your computer or network may be sending automated queries. To protect our users, we can't process your request right now. " hehe :)