Back to the main page.
Bug 948 - test_ft_megplanar does not work
| Status | CLOSED FIXED |
| Reported | 2011-09-12 09:37:00 +0200 |
| Modified | 2011-11-09 14:37:22 +0100 |
| Product: | FieldTrip |
| Component: | core |
| Version: | unspecified |
| Hardware: | PC |
| Operating System: | Mac OS |
| Importance: | P1 normal |
| Assigned to: | Jörn M. Horschig |
| URL: | |
| Tags: | |
| Depends on: | |
| Blocks: | |
| See also: |
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2011-09-12 09:37:34 +0200
to start with, it points to a file that does not exist. I commented out the non functional code. The file on which the original code worked should be recovered, so that this part of the test script can also be used.
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2011-10-19 15:32:01 +0200
Who wrote the initial test script?
Robert Oostenveld - 2011-10-19 16:45:36 +0200
roboos@mentat001> svn log test_ft_megplanar.m | tail -10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r3833 | jorhor | 2011-07-12 11:49:50 +0200 (Tue, 12 Jul 2011) | 1 line small typo in error message fixed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r3832 | jorhor | 2011-07-12 11:48:50 +0200 (Tue, 12 Jul 2011) | 1 line enhancement - added testscript for megplanar
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2011-10-19 16:46:42 +0200
Tja, I could have come up with this one myself...
Jörn M. Horschig - 2011-10-19 17:11:51 +0200
I created the mat-file avgFIC when I wrote that script, must have forgotten to upload that (done) The only other thing that failed for me with my initial script is that the plotting did not work, because I had to specify a layout. The whole script worked before when I made it, and works now again. I restored it and commented it in again. Btw, the rationale behind the code is that it checks whether the local maxima/minima stay approximately the same. Initially, I wanted to check whether I did something wrong after changing the neighbourselection stuff, luckily, I didn't
Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen - 2011-10-20 08:42:47 +0200
...Btw, the rationale behind the code is that it checks whether the local maxima/minima stay approximately the same. Initially, I wanted to check whether I did something wrong after changing the neighbourselection stuff, luckily, I didn't... Good boy.